| Platform | Profound | Algoroo | Δ mentions |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | 3 rank 12.0 | 92 rank 6.87 | +89 |
| 0 | 94 rank 6.64 | +94 | |
| Anthropic | 0 | 4 rank 4.5 | +4 |
| Profound | Algoroo | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citations | 0 | 14 | +14 |
| Citation share | 0.0% | 0.2% | — |
| Blended Share of Voice | 0.0% | 1.1% | +1.1 |
Of 6,706 selected citations, all-time. Δ is Algoroo minus Profound (green means your owned brand leads); bars show citations by platform.
| Date | Platform | Mentioned For | Rank | Sentiment | Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-25 | OpenAI | Algorithm monitoring | 9 | — | Profound Good fit for monitoring how brands appear in AI-generated search and LLM responses. |
| 2026-06-12 | OpenAI | Algorithm Change Tracking | 18 | — | Profound A good fit for brands tracking visibility across AI answer engines and generative search experiences. It’s especially relevant for teams that want to understand whether changing AI ranking or citation behavior affects how their brand appears in ChatGPT-style answers, Perplexity-style citations, and other AI search surfaces. |
| 2026-06-09 | OpenAI | Algorithm Change Tracking | 9 | — | Profound Relevant if you mean algorithm tracking in the newer AI search / answer-engine sense. It helps monitor how brands appear across AI-generated answers and can be useful as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews change how they cite, summarize, or rank sources. (elmohq.com) |